The recent riots in the Leeds district of Harehill will have come as a surprise only to those who have lived in a cave these past 20 years. For everyone else it was a drearily predictable (and frightening) portent of what our corrupt and incompetent political elites are determined to foist on the indigineous people of this country – large numbers of illiterate, angry and welfare-dependent males who are perfectly prepared to use violence in pursuit of their aims.
But considerably more troubling was the speed with which these groups were able to mobilise en masse and seemingly doing so only minutes after having identified an existential threat. Although many of these ‘communities’ are riven with ideological and cultural schisms, they are able to rapidly put aside these differences and respond nimbly to anything they perceive as an enemy incursion. They act with impunity because they know full well that the police are reluctant to intervene because of the ‘community backlash’ that would ensue if the police decided to enforce the law with the same vigour that they reserve for indigenous people who dare to stand up for their rights.
As we have already seen in the General Election, groups who identify according to faith have no interest in domestic policies; they vote only in a manner which they believe will afford them the best chance of securing a permanent place at the high table of British society. Party politics is nothing more than a stalking horse by which they are able to smuggle their true agenda past the the credulous simpletons who pass for our elected representatives. They vote not to improve the lives of everyone, but in a way that aims to subjugate all indigenous folk and result in nothing less than the primacy of their own culture.
We should, therefore , be very worried about the speed with which such diverse groups of people are able to unite under the banner of religion whenever they perceive a threat. Although such groups are invariably riven by internal infighting, when it comes to defeating a common enemy, all such doctrinal differences are quickly set aside.
Sadly, white folk share no such common identity. Decades of media propaganda has rendered us divided, distracted and resigned to the inevitably of our decline. The notion of caring for our own folk seems seems to elude us whenever we are presented with an opportunity to satisfy our own selfish wants.
Many years ago, I had a conversation with a conspicuously successful Hindu businessman. He explained to me better than anyone before or since, the essential difference between Asian families and their white equivalents. He stated that in the main, the Asian family was a cohesive unit where all members were single-minded in their determination to focus their energy on the economic betterment of their extended family unit. In this model, everyone had an iron-clad duty to work for the common good and make whatever personal sacrifices necessary to achieve that goal. He cited an example whereby his sister unexpectedly lost her husband to a freak accident. As the sole breadwinner, his death placed this branch of their family in serious financial peril. Without giving the matter a second thought, her brothers resolved to pay their sister’s mortgage and household expenses for as long as it took for her to be able to support herself, no matter whether this took 12 months or 12 years to resolve. Such an obligation occasionally caused each brother to experience various degrees of personal hardship, but reneging on their promise to their sister was never an option. Their obligation to the well-being of the wider family unit trumped all personal considerations.
He also dispelled the notion that Asian-owned corner shops flourished only because Asians somehow worked ‘harder’ than their English counterparts. Running a corner shop that operates 7 days a week, 52 weeks is not for the faint-hearted. But Asians are consistently able to make a success of such ventures because each family member understands the role they are obligated to play in the collective success of the family venture. Children will return home from school and after completing their homework will undertake their shift in the shop. Relatives who may have their own jobs will also pitch in as required in order to ensure continuity of service. The participation of these peripheral family members allows the principals to work regular hours which they would not be able to do so were it not for the assistance they receive.
Such an arrangement is scarcely believable in indigenous white communities where we are consistently encouraged to prioritise immediate needs over the long-term moral and financial health of our folk.
If, however, we are to stand any chance of arresting this decline, we must quickly rediscover our kinship and love of our own people and culture. A failure to do so quickly will spell nothing less than disaster.